Talk Calgary

 
News and Information

Home |  | Forum | Submissions | Contact 

Front Page 
 
 Calgary Talk
 
 Energy Talk
 
 Business Talk
 
 Real Estate Talk
 
 Technology Talk
 
 Medical Talk
 
 Sports Talk
 
 Entertainment Talk
 
 Restaurant Talk
 
 Dirty Talk - Public Health Violations
Search

Dirty Talk - Public Health Violations Last Updated: Mar 11th, 2007 - 20:12:06


Didsbury Meat Processors
By CHR
Jun 8, 2006, 20:02

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Didsbury Meat Processors
SE-01-31-02-W5M
PO Box 1048
Didsbury, AB, T0M 0W0

The CHR disclosed that the following conditions to exist in and about the above noted food establishment which are or may become injurious or dangerous to the public health or which might hinder the prevention or suppression of disease, namely:

 

a. Bacteriological well water sampling indicated two consecutive samples contaminated

with total coliform bacteria.

 

b. The well pit surrounding the well casing is submerged in approximately one and one-half feet of water/effluent. The integrity of the well casing and the seal around the well casings in question.

 

c. The exterior of the well house is backfilled with clean rock .The gutters and downspouts on the well house and adjoining building are missing or damaged. These conditions can easily allow surface water or effluent to run into the well pit, thus resulting in possible well water contamination.

 

d. A pitless adapter is not provided on the well according to Kevin Kurtz, business owner.

 

e. A backflow preventer is not provided in the well water distribution system according to Kevin Kurtz, business owner.

 

f. The building water distribution line and junction from the well are submerged under the water in the well pit.

 

g. The above conditions create a situation where contamination of the water system is likely.

 

AND WHEREAS such inspection disclosed that the following breaches of the Public Health Act and the Food Regulation, Alberta Regulation 31/2006 exist in and about the above noted food establishment, namely:

 

a. Unsatisfactory bacteriological well water sample results indicate an unsafe water source which contravenes Section 17 (1) (f) (i) of the Food Regulations and 2.10 of the Food Code.

 

b. There is no back-flow preventer or similar device installed in the water distribution system. This contravenes Sections 2(6) & (17) (1) (f) (i) of the Food Regulations and 2.12 (c) of the Food Code.

 

c. There is approximately one and one-half feet of water/effluent in the well pit. This contravenes Sections 2 (6) & 17 (1) (a) of the Food Regulations and 2.10 of the Food

Code.

 

d. Inadequate precautions to protect the water supply from potential contamination

contravene Sections 2 (6) & 17 (1) (f) (i) of the Food Regulations and 2.12 (c) of the

Food Code.

 

TALKCalgary shall not be held liable for any losses or damages, including lost profits, for the use of information within this website, or information that can be accessed through this website.  Although the information is thought accurate, TALKCalgary implies absolutely no warranty for its accuracy, completeness, or use.


© Copyright TALKCalgary

Top of Page

Dirty Talk - Public Health Violations
Latest Headlines
Our Place
Safeway # 292 (Deli)
New River Inn Restaurant and Lounge
Express Cafe
Bolsa Vietnamese Restaurant
The Regal Beagle Pub
Singapore Samís
Sun Chiu Kee BBQ Restaurant
Safeway
The Regal Beagle